E-game should be defined as sport Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

E-game should be defined as sport - Essay Example E-Sport is defined as a virtual game played competitively (GMZ). The difference between them comes down to a common factor of physical exertion. According to some E-game critics, any sporting activity that does not have physical exertion does not qualify to be a sport (Benjamin 17). Over the decades, sporting activities have experienced revolution just like in any other industry. Sports such as golfing, bows and curling have all been classified as sports despite the minimal or absence of physical exertions. E-Games are sports that requires a lot of concentration, skills, and focus just like soccer or any other sport. For instance, Chess is a sport that does not involve any physical movement. Additionally, E-Game requires strategy that needs mental prowess just like soccer and athletics needs one to be physically fit. These games require; one to practice and learn how opponents play as well as understanding rules of the game. Unlike other sports, there are hundreds of E-Games with different styles and methods of playing. Excelling in these games requires a lot of dedication, training, and perfection; and to remain competitive in these games, one has to practice and train regularly. In the game like poker card, players participate in their game while sitting down without any physical movement and yet are accepted as sports worldwide (Benjamin 15). In fact, Porker card games is software installed in computers just like the E-Games. There is no significance difference between the E-game and poker card. In rational point of view, the aspect of physical involvement is not the only aspect that should be used to define a game as a sport. Subjectively, E-Games are perceived as games for the lazy people who prefer sitting down in their couches and playing the games at comfort of their houses. However, the question is; can it be considered as lazy game for a physically impaired person, who cannot

Incapacitation Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Incapacitation - Term Paper Example In the cases that the criminal is not conditioned, by remaining in prison they remain unable to commit further crimes. Collective incapacitation is the implementation of crime-control effects of the present criminal justice system due to incapacitation. Collective incapacitation attempts to prevent crime by increasing the rate and length of time that a broad range of offenders spend in prison. This is done without taking into consideration possible future offenses. Selective incapacitation is an altered form of incapacitation that justifies the practice of giving more dangerous and indefatigable offenders long prison sentences, some of which can be indefinite or extend over numerous life terms. Selective incapacitation focuses more on criminals who are more likely to repeat their offenses in the future or else engage in more dangerous activity upon being released from their initial prison sentence (Auerhahn, 2003). Selective incapacitation is sometimes used on people who are less likely to commit further offenses, ensuring that their one sentence is going to be enough to rehabilitate them. Though collective and selective incapacitation both deal with the implementation of prison time to enable criminal offenders to avoid future offenses, there are differences between the two concepts. The greatest difference between collective and selective incapacitation is the purpose. Collective incapacitation is used for criminal defenders as a whole, though focuses especially on offenders that are not believed to commit further offenses in the future. Selective incapacitation is more picky, focusing on criminals that are at risk for being repeat offenders, or criminals that have no chance at repeating their mistakes after being imprisoned. The effect of incapacitation varies from criminal to criminal (Hawkins & Zimring, 1997). The majority of criminals that